Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 Infection
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 December 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (24), 2293-2303
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa030264
Abstract
The optimal sequencing of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is unknown. We compared several different antiretroviral treatment strategies. This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind trial used a factorial design to compare pairs of sequential three-drug regimens, starting with a regimen including zidovudine and lamivudine or a regimen including didanosine and stavudine in combination with either nelfinavir or efavirenz. The primary end point was the length of time to the failure of the second three-drug regimen. A total of 620 subjects who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were followed for a median of 2.3 years. Starting with a three-drug regimen containing efavirenz combined with zidovudine and lamivudine (but not efavirenz combined with didanosine and stavudine) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with a regimen containing nelfinavir (hazard ratio for failure of the second regimen, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.06), as well as to delay the second virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.09), and significantly delayed the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.39) and the first virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.34). Starting with zidovudine and lamivudine combined with efavirenz (but not zidovudine and lamivudine combined with nelfinavir) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with didanosine and stavudine (hazard ratio, 0.68), and significantly delayed both the first and the second virologic failures (hazard ratio for the first virologic failure, 0.39; hazard ratio for the second virologic failure, 0.47), as well as the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.35). The initial use of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz resulted in a shorter time to viral suppression. The efficacy of antiretroviral drugs depends on how they are combined. The combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz is superior to the other antiretroviral regimens used as initial therapy in this study.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Four-Drug Regimens and Pairs of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapyHIV Medicine, 2003
- Changes in Mitochondrial DNA as a Marker of Nucleoside Toxicity in HIV-Infected PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Genotypic Correlates of Phenotypic Resistance to Efavirenz in Virus Isolates from Patients Failing Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor TherapyJournal of Virology, 2001
- Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: The AACTG Adherence InstrumentsAIDS Care, 2000
- Efavirenz plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine, Efavirenz plus Indinavir, and Indinavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Mitochondrial toxicity induced by nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors is a key factor in the pathogenesis of antiretroviral-therapy-related lipodystrophyThe Lancet, 1999
- Treatment with Amprenavir Alone or Amprenavir with Zidovudine and Lamivudine in Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958