Slower processing speed after treatment for pediatric brain tumor and acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- 28 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psycho‐Oncology
- Vol. 22 (9), 1979-1986
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3255
Abstract
Background Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and brain tumor (BT) survivors are at risk for post‐treatment IQ declines. The extent to which lower scores represent global cognitive decline versus domain‐specific impairment remains unclear. This study examined discrepancies between processing speed and estimated IQ (EIQ) scores and identified clinical characteristics associated with score discrepancies in a sample of pediatric cancer survivors. Procedure Survivors (50 ALL, 50 BT) ages 12–17 years completed cognitive testing. The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence provided an untimed measure of general reasoning ability (EIQ). The age‐appropriate Wechsler Intelligence Scale provided a Processing Speed Index (PSI) score. Scores were examined and compared. Results Survivors' PSI scores were lower than their EIQ scores (BT t(45) = 6.3, p < 0.001; ALL t(49) = 6.9, p < 0.001). For BT survivors, lower PSI scores were associated with history of craniospinal irradiation, t(44) = 3.3, p < 0.01. For ALL survivors, lower PSI scores were associated with male gender, grade retention, and time since diagnosis, F(3, 46) = 10.1, p < 0.001. Clinically significant EIQ‐PSI score discrepancies were identified in 41.3% of BT and 14.0% of ALL survivors. Conclusions Many pediatric BT and ALL survivors exhibit slower processing speed than expected for age, whereas general reasoning ability remains largely intact. Risk factors associated with larger EIQ‐PSI discrepancies include the following: BT diagnosis, craniospinal irradiation (BT only), male gender, and younger age at diagnosis (ALL only). Grade retention was frequent and associated with lower EIQ scores (both groups) and PSI scores (ALL only). Describing post‐treatment cognitive declines using global measures of intellectual ability may underestimate dysfunction or fail to isolate specific underlying deficits contributing to impairment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Children Treated for High-Grade Gliomas: Children's Oncology Group L991 Final Study ReportJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- The impact of therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia on intelligence quotients; results of the risk-stratified randomized central nervous system treatment trial MRC UKALL XIJournal of Hematology & Oncology, 2011
- Longitudinal evaluation of neurocognitive function after treatment for central nervous system germ cell tumors in childhoodCancer, 2011
- ADHD and secondary ADHD criteria fail to identify many at‐risk survivors of pediatric ALL and brain tumorPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2011
- Adolescent cancer survivors’ smoking intentions are associated with aggression, attention, and smoking historyJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2010
- A quantitative meta‐analysis of neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of pediatric brain tumorsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2010
- Attention and working memory abilities in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemiaCancer, 2010
- Cognitive and Adaptive Outcome in Extracerebellar Low-Grade Brain Tumors in Children: A Report From the Children's Oncology GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Predicting Change in Academic Abilities After Conformal Radiation Therapy for Localized EpendymomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Cognitive processing speed and the structure of white matter pathways: Convergent evidence from normal variation and lesion studiesNeuroImage, 2008