Automated, ambulatory, or conventional blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: Which is the better predictor of severe hypertension?
- 31 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 178 (3), 521-526
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70432-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypertension in pregnancy: Which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome?Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- A hybrid paired and unpaired analysis for the comparison of proportionsStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Reference data for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: What results are equivalent to the established limits of office blood pressure?Klinische Wochenschrift, 1990
- 6 Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension—an economic approach to the use of daycareBailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Development and validation of a multivariate predictor of mortality in very low birth weightJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1987
- New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeksEarly Human Development, 1987
- EFFECTS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY THE DOCTOR ON PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE AND HEART RATEThe Lancet, 1983