Combined Effects of Sleeping Position and Prenatal Risk Factors in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: The Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 100 (4), 613-621
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.4.613
Abstract
Objective. Prone sleeping is a strong risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). We investigated whether the combined effect of prone sleeping position and prenatal risk factors further increased the SIDS risk.Methods. In the Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study, parents of SIDS victims in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden completed a questionnaire on potential risk factors for SIDS. Forensic pathologists verified the SIDS diagnosis. Four controls of the same gender, age, and place of birth were selected. This matched case–control study, which included 244 SIDS cases and 869 controls from 1992 to 1995, was analyzed by conditional logistic regression.Results. Odds ratios (ORs) for prone and side sleeping compared with supine sleeping for the last sleep were 13.9 (95% confidence interval 8.2–24) and 3.5 (2.1–5.7). Infants 13 to 24 weeks old had particularly high risk in prone and side sleeping, at 28.5 (7.9–107) and 5.9 (1.6–22). OR for prone sleeping was higher in girls, at 30.4 (11–88), than in boys, 10.3 (5.5–19). We found strong combined effects of sleeping position and prenatal risk factors (more than multiplicative). The OR for prone and side sleeping was increased for infants with birth weight <2500 g, at 83 (25–276) and 36.6 (13–107); for preterm infants, at 48.8 (19–128) and 40.5 (14–115); and for intrauterine growth retarded, at 38.8 (14–108) and 9.6 (4.3–22), compared with supine position in infants without these prenatal factors. The combined effect of nonsupine positions and intrauterine growth retarded was highest among 13- to 24-week-old infants. Effects of combined presence of nonsupine sleeping positions and each of the factors of smoking in pregnancy, young maternal age, higher parity, low level of maternal education, and single motherhood were more than additive. Attributable fractions in the population for prone and side sleeping were 18.5% and 26.0%.Conclusions. Both prone and side sleeping increased the risk of SIDS. The risk was increased further in low birth weight infants, preterm infants, and infants at the age of 13 to 24 weeks, suggesting that SIDS may be triggered by nonsupine sleeping in infants with prenatal risk factors during a vulnerable period of postnatal development.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome in Norway 1967-91.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995
- Sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): effect of an intervention programme to avoid prone sleepingActa Paediatrica, 1995
- Lower body temperature in sleeping supine infants.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995
- Infant survival in Norway and Sweden 1985–88Acta Paediatrica, 1994
- Sleeping position for infants and cot death in The Netherlands 1985-91.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1993
- Four modifiable and other major risk factors for cot death: The New Zealand studyJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1992
- Cot deaths and sleep position campaignsThe Lancet, 1992
- Secular Trends of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Other Causes of Post Perinatal Mortality in Norwegian Birth Cohorts 1967–1984Acta Paediatrica, 1989
- Computational implementation of the conditional logistic regression model in the analysis of epidemiologic matched studiesComputers and Biomedical Research, 1988
- Birthweight and Perinatal Mortality: III. Towards a New Method of AnalysisInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986