Is there a trade‐off between the plant's growth response to elevated CO2 and subsequent litter decomposability?
- 2 October 2003
- Vol. 103 (1), 17-30
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12276.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N and water under varying atmospheric CO2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland speciesNew Phytologist, 2001
- Elevated CO2, litter chemistry, and decomposition: a synthesisOecologia, 2001
- FOREST LITTER PRODUCTION, CHEMISTRY, AND DECOMPOSITION FOLLOWING TWO YEARS OF FREE-AIR CO2ENRICHMENTEcology, 2001
- Generalities in the growth, allocation and leaf quality responses to elevated CO2in eight woody speciesNew Phytologist, 1999
- Do slow‐growing species and nutrient‐stressed plants respond relatively strongly to elevated CO2?Global Change Biology, 1998
- Initial Litter Respiration as Indicator for Long-Term Leaf Litter Decomposition of Carex SpeciesOikos, 1997
- Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on biomass production and partitioning in Betula pubescens Ehrh. seedlings at different ozone and temperature regimesEnvironmental Pollution, 1995
- Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentrationPlant Ecology, 1993
- Analysis of the Differential Response of Five Annuals to Elevated CO2 during GrowthEcology, 1990
- Aboveground Biomass and Nutrient Dynamics of Calluna vulgaris and Molinia caerulea in a Dry HeathlandOikos, 1989