The public understanding of science or the scientific understanding of the public? A review of the social context of the `new genetics'
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Public Understanding of Science
- Vol. 4 (3), 223-232
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/3/001
Abstract
The `new genetics' have great potential for improving human health. In order for this potential to be realized, attempts to improve the public understanding of science should be complemented by attempts to improve our scientific understanding of the public. It is important to investigate existing popular understandings and practices, in relation to the role of heredity in human disease, chance and calculation of cost benefit ratios in situations of uncertainty, the management of the role of being `at risk' for particular diseases, and the ways in which individual and collective interests are balanced in a variety of health and welfare fields. Above all, we need to study what individuals, families and social institutions actually know, feel and do in relation to the `new genetics', rather than basing policy on assumptions about what they might know, feel or do.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reproductive careers of a cohort of men and women following an HIV-positive diagnosisJournal of Biosocial Science, 1994
- The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agendaSociology of Health & Illness, 1994
- The new genetics: some issues for social scientists.Sociology of Health & Illness, 1993
- Attitudes toward prenatal screening for fetal abnormality and detection of carriers of genetic disease: A discussion paperJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1993
- Genetics and public health.BMJ, 1992
- Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implications of coronary candidacy for health education.Sociology of Health & Illness, 1991
- Inheriting heart trouble: the relevance of common-sense ideas to preventive measuresHealth Education Research, 1989