Growth and leaf physiology of monkeyflowers with different altitude ranges
- 9 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 148 (2), 183-194
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0361-z
Abstract
Every species is limited both geographically and ecologically to a subset of available habitats, yet for many species the causes of distribution limits are unknown. Temperature is thought to be one of the primary determinants of species distributions along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients. This study examined leaf physiology and plant performance under contrasting temperature regimes of sister species of monkeyflower, Mimulus cardinalis and Mimulus lewisii (Phrymaceae), that differ in altitude distribution to test the hypothesis that temperature is the primary determinant of differences in fitness versus altitude. Each species attained greatest aboveground biomass, net photosynthetic rate, and effective quantum yield of photosystem II when grown under temperatures characteristic of the altitudinal range center. Although both species exhibited greater stem length, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO2 concentration in hot than in cold temperatures, these traits showed much greater reductions under cold temperature for M. cardinalis than for M. lewisii. Survival of M. lewisii was also sensitive to temperature, showing a striking decrease in hot temperatures. Within each temperature regime, the species native to that temperature displayed greatest growth and leaf physiological capacity. Populations from the altitude range center and range margin of each species were used to examine population differentiation, but central and marginal populations did not differ in most growth or leaf physiological responses to temperature. This study provides evidence that M. cardinalis and M. lewisii differ in survival, growth, and leaf physiology under temperature regimes characterizing their contrasting low and high altitude range centers, and suggests that the species’ altitude range limits may arise, in part, due to metabolic limitations on growth that ultimately decrease survival and limit reproduction.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theoretical models of species’ borders: single species approachesOikos, 2004
- Environmental limits to growth: physiological niche boundaries of corals along turbidity–light gradientsOecologia, 2004
- Stomatal closure induced by high vapor pressure deficit limited midday photosynthesis at the canopy top of Fagus crenata Blume on Naeba mountain in JapanTrees, 2004
- A comparative study of allozyme variation of peripheral and central populations of Silene nutans L. (Caryophyllaceae) from Western Europe: implications for conservationÖsterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 2003
- The temperature dependence of shoot hydraulic resistance: implications for stomatal behaviour and hydraulic limitationPlant, Cell & Environment, 2001
- Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2000
- Contribution of photosynthetic rate to growth and reproduction in Amaranthus hybridusOecologia, 1998
- Temperature Responses and Distribution of Several Mediterranean Macroalgae Belonging to Different Distribution GroupsBotanica Marina, 1993
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GEUM RIVALE L. AND G. URBANUM L. TO DETERMINE THOSE FACTORS CONTROLLING THEIR ALTITUDINAL DISTRIBUTIONNew Phytologist, 1986
- The Nature of Limits to Natural SelectionAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1976