Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy.
Open Access
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 22 (3), 135-139
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.3.135
Abstract
Equipoise is advocated as a means of achieving high scientific and ethical standards in randomised trials. As used in the context of research the word describes a state of uncertainty characterised by the belief that in a trial no arm is known to offer greater harm or benefit than any other arm. Clinicians who lack personal equipoise are advised to accept clinical or communal equipoise, based on current unresolved disagreement among the medical profession. Equipoise is mainly discussed in the literature as an issue for senior doctors and research directors. Limitations of professional equipoise are reviewed, and data on the neglected topic of patients' equipoise are reported using the example of breast cancer trials. In theory, a patient who gives informed and voluntary consent to enter a randomised trial has achieved the equilibrium of equipoise. In practice, equipoise among patients ranges from personal to proxy acceptance.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMMUNITY‐EQUIPOISE AND THE ETHICS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALSBioethics, 1995
- The ethics of ignorance.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1995
- Management of breast cancer in southeast EnglandBMJ, 1994
- Information needs and decision‐making preferences of children with cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 1993
- Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.BMJ, 1993
- New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987