Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test
Open Access
- 8 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 275 (1644), 1817-1822
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0331
Abstract
The similarity between many Old World parasitic cuckoos (Cuculinae) and Accipiter hawks, in size, shape and plumage, has been noted since ancient times. In particular, hawk-like underpart barring is more prevalent in parasitic than in non-parasitic cuckoos. Cuckoo-hawk resemblance may reflect convergent evolution of cryptic plumage that reduces detection by hosts and prey, or evolved mimicry of hawks by parasitic cuckoos, either for protection against hawk attacks or to facilitate brood parasitism by influencing host behaviour. Here, we provide the first evidence that some small birds respond to common cuckoos Cuculus canorus as if they were sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Great tits and blue tits were equally alarmed and reduced attendance at feeders during and after the presentation of mounted specimens of common cuckoos and sparrowhawks, but not in response to control presentations of collared doves or teal. Plumage manipulations revealed that the strong alarm response to cuckoos depended on their resemblance to hawks; cuckoos with barred underparts were treated like hawks, while those with unbarred underparts were treated like doves. However, barring was not the only feature inducing alarm because tits showed similarly strong alarm to barred and unbarred hawks, and little alarm to barred doves. These responses of tits, unsuitable as hosts and hence with no history of cuckoo parasitism, suggest that naive small birds can mistake cuckoos for hawks. Thus, any cuckoo-hawk discrimination by host species is likely to be an evolved response to brood parasitism.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aggressive mimics profit from a model–signal receiver mutualismProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- The evolution of sexual dimorphism in parasitic cuckoos: sexual selection or coevolution?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit,Parus majorProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- Mobbing of a Drongo CuckooSurniculus lugubrisIbis, 1997
- Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and Merlins F. columbariusIbis, 1996
- Predation risk and the cost of being fatNature, 1995
- Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus prediction and feeding site selection by itsIbis, 1995
- Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolutionAnimal Behaviour, 1995
- An Experimental Study of Co-Evolution Between the Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its Hosts. I. Host Egg DiscriminationJournal of Animal Ecology, 1989
- Interspecific Communication Signals in Parasitic BirdsThe American Naturalist, 1967