Impaired Activity Rate Responsiveness of an Atrial Activity‐Triggered Pacemaker: The Role of Differential Atrial Sensing in its Prevention
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 12 (12), 1927-1937
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb01886.x
Abstract
The physiological benefit of rate responsive, single-chamber cardiac pacing is well documented. We studied the activity response of nine atrially placed Activitrax II pacemakers. Seven patients were noted to have an inadequate activity-rate response with maximal pacing rates of 85 to 101 beats/min. Marker Channel analysis revealed that the upper rate timeout was reset by far-field R wave sensing, even when sensing occurred in the atrial refractory period. These 9 pacemakers were tested by atrial sensitivity adjustment for ability to exclude far-field R wave sensing, while preserving P wave sensing. Unipolar implantation data were then examined for predictors of this differential far-R and P-wave sensing. Differential atrial sensing occurred in 4/9 pacemakers (2/2 bipolar in the right atrial appendage; 0/1 bipolar in the coronary sinus; and 4/9 unipolar). An empirically developed index utilizing unipolar implant parameters discriminated outcomes for 8/9 unipolar pacemakers. We conclude that: (1) the rate responsiveness of the atrial Activitrax II pacemaker is limited by far-field R wave sensing even when this occurs during atrial channel refractoriness; (2) reprogramming atrial sensitivity to differentially sensed P and far-field R waves may restore appropriate rate responsiveness; and (3) although a unipolar implant discriminant index may correctly identify adequacy of future rate responsiveness, the atrial application of the Activitrax II pacemaker is cautioned until further validation is forthcoming, particularly when used in unipolar and coronary sinus applications.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensors for Rate Modulated PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Pacemaker Syndrome with AAI Rate Variable Pacing: Importance of Atrioventricular Conduction Properties, Medication, and Pacemaker ProgrammabilityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- The Importance of Different Atrioventricular Intervals for Exercise CapacityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Sensor-Triggered, Rate-Variable Cardiac PacingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Clinical Experience with an Activity Sensing Pacemaker.Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Activity‐Sensing, Rate‐Responsive Pacing: Improvement in Myocardial Performance with ExercisePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- The effect of electrode position on atrial sensing for physiologically responsive cardiac pacemakersAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Atrial Synchronized Ventricular Pacing: Contribution of the Chronotropic Response to Improved Exercise PerformancePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Physiologic Benefits of Rate ResponsivenessPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Characteristics of Intracardiac Electrograms II: Atrial Endocardial ElectrogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1980