How Dispersal Limitation Shapes Species–Body Size Distributions in Local Communities
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The American Naturalist
- Vol. 163 (1), 69-83
- https://doi.org/10.1086/380582
Abstract
A critical but poorly understood pattern in macroecology is the often unimodal species-body size distribution (also known as body size-diversity relationship) in a local community (embedded in a much larger regional species pool). Purely neutral community models that assume functional equivalence among species are incapable of explaining this pattern because body size is the key determinant of functional differences between species. Several niche-based explanations have been offered, but none of them is completely satisfactory. Here we develop a simple model that unites a neutral community model with niche-based theory to explain the relationship. In the model, species of similar size are assumed to belong to the same size guild. Within a size guild, all individuals are equivalent in their competition for resources, sensu Hubbell's neutral community model; they have the same speciation rate and dispersal capacities. Between size guilds, however, the total number of individuals, the speciation rate, and the dispersal capacities differ, but using known allometric scaling laws for these properties, we can describe the differences between size guilds. Our model predicts that species richness reaches an optimum at an intermediate body size, in agreement with observations. The optimum at intermediate body size is basically the result of a trade-off between, on the one hand, allometric scaling laws for the number of individuals and the speciation rate that decrease with body size and, on the other hand, the scaling law for active dispersal that increases with body size.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE UNIFIED NEUTRAL THEORY OF BIODIVERSITY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY: REPLYEcology, 2004
- The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 2000
- On investigating local–regional species richness relationshipsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1999
- Abundance, diversity and body size: patterns from a grassland arthropod communityJournal of Animal Ecology, 1999
- Does Body Size Optimization Result in Skewed Body Size Distribution on a Logarithmic Scale?The American Naturalist, 1999
- The distribution of mammal body massesDiversity and Distributions, 1998
- Biodiversity and body size: patterns among British birdsEcography, 1998
- A Practical Model of Metapopulation DynamicsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1994
- Lotteries in communities of sessile organismsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1988
- Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengthsNature, 1985