With the recent changes in surgical training and sub-specialisation, the role of surgical trainees in more advanced surgical procedures has come into question. In order to examine this further, we analysed the early outcome of patients in a single surgical unit undergoing pancreatic resections, with regard to the grade of the surgeon performing the operation. Between January 1994 and May 1996, data were collected prospectively on all the patients undergoing pancreatic resections with regards to the grade of the surgeon performing the procedure and the early outcome following the operation. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreatic resections for both benign and malignant diseases. Overall, 19 operations (31%) were performed by trainees under supervision, 14 of the 40 pancreatico-duodenectomies (35%) and 5 of the 19 left partial pancreatectomies (26%). All 3 total pancreatectomies were carried out by consultants. In the 43 patients operated upon by the consultants, there were 8 anastomotic leaks (19%) and 1 death. In the 19 patients operated upon by the supervised trainees, there were only 2 anastomotic leaks (11%) and no deaths. This series has demonstrated that in a unit with a major interest and large workload in pancreatic surgery, there appears to be no difference between a consultant and a supervised trainee in the early outcome following pancreatic resections.