Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 82 (4), 530-533
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820430
Abstract
After cardiopulmonary complications, perforation is the second most important cause of complications following flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A recent audit of 14149 procedures detected a perforation rate of 0.05 per cent (overall mortality rate 0.008 per cent) during diagnostic endoscopy, and a perforation rate of 2.6 percent (overall mortality rate 1.0 per cent) following oesophageal intubation or dilatation. The incidence of perforation following both diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has not changed over the past 10 years. The risk factors are numerous but this audit demonstrated that inexperience increases the likelihood of perforation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instrumental perforation of the oesophagus A ten year study from two ENT clinicsThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1986
- Advisability of Concomitant Immediate Surgery for Perforation and Underlying Disease of the EsophagusScandinavian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984
- Complications of esophageal dilation and guidelines for their preventionGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1981
- Oesophageal perforation at fibreoptic gastroscopy.BMJ, 1981
- New dilemmas for training program directorsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1981
- Perforation of the oesophagus: Experience in a general hospitalBritish Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Operative and Nonoperative Management of Esophageal PerforationsAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Endoscopic complications: The Texas experienceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1979
- Oesophageal trauma: incidence, diagnosis, and management.Thorax, 1977
- Endoscopic ComplicationsJAMA, 1976