PLAIN ABDOMINAL X-RAY VERSUS COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY SCREENING: SENSITIVITY FOR STONE LOCALIZATION AFTER NONENHANCED SPIRAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 164 (2), 308-310
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67346-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE VALUE OF UNENHANCED HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE FLANK PAINJournal of Urology, 1998
- Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.Radiology, 1997
- Spiral Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Flank Pain: A Replacement for Excretory UrographyJournal of Urology, 1997
- Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.Radiology, 1995
- Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogramArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Sonography vs. excretory urography in acute flank painAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1985