Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog, causal ape.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Vol. 120 (1), 38-47
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38
Abstract
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and great apes from the genus Pan were tested on a series of object choice tasks. In each task, the location of hidden food was indicated for subjects by some kind of communicative, behavioral, or physical cue. On the basis of differences in the ecologies of these 2 genera, as well as on previous research, the authors hypothesized that dogs should be especially skillful in using human communicative cues such as the pointing gesture, whereas apes should be especially skillful in using physical, causal cues such as food in a cup making noise when it is shaken. The overall pattern of performance by the 2 genera strongly supported this social-dog, causal-ape hypothesis. This result is discussed in terms of apes' adaptations for complex, extractive foraging and dogs' adaptations, during the domestication process, for cooperative communication with humans.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third KindPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2005
- All Great Ape Species Follow Gaze to Distant Locations and Around Barriers.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2005
- Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different resultsAnimal Cognition, 2004
- Inferences About the Location of Food in the Great Apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2004
- Recognizing Impossible Object Relations: Intuitions About Support in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2004
- Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objectsAnimal Cognition, 2000
- Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice taskAnimal Cognition, 1998
- Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1998
- Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeysAnimal Behaviour, 1995
- Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1994