Economic Crisis and the Centralization of Control Over the Managerial Process: Corporate Restructuring and Neo-Fordist Decision-Making
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Sociological Review
- Vol. 59 (5), 723-745
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2096445
Abstract
I analyze the effects of the recent intensification of control over the managerial process in a large steel corporation in the United States. Corporate restructuring was an attempt to overcome constraints on capital accumulation and resolve the contradictions and inefficiencies embedded in the previous controls over the managerial process. Formal controls over the managerial process were intensified to standardize decisions, improve product quality, and reduce costs. Additional findings include: (1) discretion over many decisions was centralized in decision centers where conceptual activities were performed; (2) the new formal controls increased surveillance over production managers; (3) many decisions were eliminated, which reduced the need for some managers and eliminated four layers of the managerial hierarchy; and (4) the corporation became more tightly coupled and more flexible. These Neo-Fordist controls entailed a structure of capital accumulation that separated conception from execution while enhancing control over the managerial process.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Irrationality and Contradiction in Organizational Change: Transformation in the Corporate Form of a U.S. Steel Corporation, 1930–1987The Sociological Quarterly, 1991
- Transplanted Organizations: The Transfer of Japanese Industrial Organization to the U.S.American Sociological Review, 1991
- The Process of Change in Public OrganizationsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1989
- Big Brother and the Sweatshop: Computer Surveillance in the Automated OfficeSociological Theory, 1987
- Interorganizational DialecticsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980