The Loop Coverage Comparison Between TCM and Echo Canceller Under Various Noise Considerations

Abstract

This paper describes loop coverage evaluations of two-wire digital subscriber transmission systems to support the CCITT recommended 1-430 interface. Several range-limiting factors are discussed and a cable utility design for two representative two-wire digital subscriber transmission systems is presented. The two transmission systems are time compression multiplexing (TCM) and echo canceller (EC), utilizing the AMI line code and full cosine rolloff line equalization for both systems. A new impulse noise evaluation is applied to cable utility design, because impulse noise is one of the most stringent range-limiting factors, especially for TCM in utilizing existing subscriber loops. Comparison of TCM with EC is also carried out according to various range-limiting factors. As a result, it is noted that the 320 kbit/s line bit rate TCM is more applicable in NTT's exchange area coverage than the 160 kbit/s EC to achieve the2B + Dbasic interface transmission.