Orbital Overlap and Chemical Bonding
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Chemistry – A European Journal
- Vol. 12 (36), 9196-9216
- https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200600564
Abstract
The chemical bonds in the diatomic molecules Li2–F2 and Na2–Cl2 at different bond lengths have been analyzed by the energy decomposition analysis (EDA) method using DFT calculations at the BP86/TZ2P level. The interatomic interactions are discussed in terms of quasiclassical electrostatic interactions ΔEelstat, Pauli repulsion ΔEPauli and attractive orbital interactions ΔEorb. The energy terms are compared with the orbital overlaps at different interatomic distances. The quasiclassical electrostatic interactions between two electrons occupying 1s, 2s, 2p(σ), and 2p(π) orbitals have been calculated and the results are analyzed and discussed. It is shown that the equilibrium distances of the covalent bonds are not determined by the maximum overlap of the σ valence orbitals, which nearly always has its largest value at clearly shorter distances than the equilibrium bond length. The crucial interaction that prevents shorter bonds is not the loss of attractive interactions, but a sharp increase in the Pauli repulsion between electrons in valence orbitals. The attractive interactions of ΔEorb and the repulsive interactions of ΔEPauli are both determined by the orbital overlap. The net effect of the two terms depends on the occupation of the valence orbitals, but the onset of attractive orbital interactions occurs at longer distances than Pauli repulsion, because overlap of occupied orbitals with vacant orbitals starts earlier than overlap between occupied orbitals. The contribution of ΔEelstat in most nonpolar covalent bonds is strongly attractive. This comes from the deviation of quasiclassical electron–electron repulsion and nuclear–electron attraction from Coulomb's law for point charges. The actual strength of ΔEelstat depends on the size and shape of the occupied valence orbitals. The attractive electrostatic contributions in the diatomic molecules Li2–F2 come from the s and p(σ) electrons, while the p(π) electrons do not compensate for nuclear–nuclear repulsion. It is the interplay of the three terms ΔEorb, ΔEPauli, and ΔEelstat that determines the bond energies and equilibrium distances of covalently bonded molecules. Molecules like N2 and O2, which are usually considered as covalently bonded, would not be bonded without the quasiclassical attraction ΔEelstat.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Nature of the Chemical Bond Revisited: An Energy‐Partitioning Analysis of Nonpolar BondsChemistry – A European Journal, 2005
- The Nature of the Transition Metal−Carbonyl Bond and the Question about the Valence Orbitals of Transition Metals. A Bond-Energy Decomposition Analysis of TM(CO)6q (TMq = Hf2-, Ta-, W, Re+, Os2+, Ir3+)Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2000
- Central bond in the three CN.cntdot.dimers NC-CN, CN-CN and CN-NC: electron pair bonding and Pauli repulsion effectsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1992
- Chemical properties from the promoleculeThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1986
- Roothaan-Hartree-Fock-Slater atomic wave functionsAtomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 1981
- The Physical Nature of the Chemical BondReviews of Modern Physics, 1962
- THE NATURE OF THE CHEMICAL BOND. APPLICATION OF RESULTS OBTAINED FROM THE QUANTUM MECHANICS AND FROM A THEORY OF PARAMAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO THE STRUCTURE OF MOLECULESJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1931
- Quantentheoretische Beitr ge zum BenzolproblemThe European Physical Journal A, 1931
- Zur Quantentheorie der DoppelbindungThe European Physical Journal A, 1930
- Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und hom opolare Bindung nach der QuantenmechanikThe European Physical Journal A, 1927