The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery Rate
- 7 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 340 (1), 54-57
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199901073400112
Abstract
In 1995, the rate of cesarean delivery in the United States was 21 percent.1 The goal of Healthy People 2000, a project of the Department of Health and Human Services, is to reduce this rate to 15 percent by the year 2000.2 The advantages of a safe vaginal delivery over a cesarean delivery are clear: a vaginal delivery is associated with lower maternal and neonatal morbidity, and it costs less. We contend that these advantages apply only to safe vaginal deliveries and that reducing the rate of cesarean delivery may lead to higher costs and more complications for mothers and . . .Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during laborPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- At last---maternity statistics for EnglandBMJ, 1998
- The Impact of Legislatively Imposed Practice Guidelines on Cesarean Section Rates: The Florida ExperienceAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 1997
- Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean SectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: A statewide programObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- A Clinical Trial of Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1990
- A Successful Program to Lower Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Vaginal birth after cesareanAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987