Strategies for Increasing the Rigor of Qualitative Methods in Evaluation of Health Care Programs
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 14 (1), 57-74
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9001400104
Abstract
The traditional quantitative emphasis of health services research obscures the fact that qualitative techniques are the best means of investigating the evaluation of certain health services research problems. Two evaluation studies employing qualitative methods are described to illustrate the appropriateness of such methods for addressing certain research questions. A brief discussion of current opinion concerning reliability and validity issues associated with these methods is provided A detailed description of the techniques that can be used to improve the rigor and credibility of qualitative methods in evaluation research concludes this article.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical Sociology: Some Tensions Among Theory, Method, and SubstanceJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 1989
- Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational InquirersEducational Researcher, 1986
- Qualitative Methods in Occupational Therapy Research: An ApplicationThe Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1985
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- Are Validity and Reliability "Relevant" in Qualitative Evaluation Research?Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1984
- Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared CraftEducational Researcher, 1984
- Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Some techniques of data reduction and displayQuality & Quantity, 1983
- Ethnographic Data Collection in Evaluation ResearchEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic ResearchReview of Educational Research, 1982
- Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiriesECTJ, 1981