HIV-1 subtype C viruses rapidly develop K65R resistance to tenofovir in cell culture
- 12 June 2006
- journal article
- fast track
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 20 (9), F9-F13
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000232228.88511.0b
Abstract
Background: Genotypic diversity among HIV-1 subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRF) may lead to distinct pathways to drug resistance. This study evaluated subtype-related differences in the development of resistance in culture to tenofovir. Methods: Genotyping determined nucleotide diversity among subtypes. Representative subtype B, C, CRF1_AE, CRF2_AG, G, and HIV-2 isolates were selected for resistance to tenofovir, lamivudine and didanosine in cell culture. Phenotypic assays determined the effects of the K65R substitution in reverse transcriptase (RT) on drug susceptibility. Results: Subtype C isolates show unique polymorphisms in RT codons 64 (AAG→AAA), 65 (AAA→AAG), and 66 (AAA→AAG), absent in other subtypes. The K65R mutation (AAG→AGG) arose with tenofovir by week 12 in four subtype C selections. In contrast, no tenofovir resistance arose in four subtype B (> 34–74 weeks), one each of CRF2_AG and G (> 30–33 weeks), and three HIV-2 (> 27–28 weeks) selections. K65R appeared after 55 and 73 weeks in two CRF1_AE selections with tenofovir. In contrast, times to the appearance of M184V with lamivudine pressure (weeks 8–14) did not vary among subtypes. Selective didanosine pressure resulted in the appearance of M184V and L74V after 38 weeks in two of four subtype C selections. The K65R transitions in subtype C and other subtypes (AGG and AGA) conferred similar 6.5–10-fold resistance to tenofovir and five to 25-fold crossresistance to each of abacavir, lamivudine, and didanosine, while not affecting zidovudine susceptibility. Conclusion: Tenofovir -based regimens will need to be carefully monitored in subtype C infections for the possible selection of K65R.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Less than the Sum of Its Parts: Failure of a Tenofovir‐Abacavir‐Lamivudine Triple‐Nucleoside RegimenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Early Virologic Nonresponse to Tenofovir, Abacavir, and Lamivudine in HIV‐Infected Antiretroviral‐Naive SubjectsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- K65R and Y181C are less prevalent in HAART-experienced HIV-1 subtype A patientsAIDS, 2005
- Promote HIV Chemoprophylaxis Research, Don't Prevent ItScience, 2005
- Comparative Selection of the K65R and M184V/I Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients Enrolled in a Trial of First-Line Triple-Nucleoside Analog Therapy (Tonus IMEA 021)Journal of Virology, 2005
- Impact of HIV-1 Subtype and Antiretroviral Therapy on Protease and Reverse Transcriptase Genotype: Results of a Global CollaborationPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Predictors of selection of K65RAIDS, 2004
- Nucleotide and Amino Acid Polymorphisms at Drug Resistance Sites in Non-B-Subtype Variants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2004
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive PatientsA 3-Year Randomized TrialJAMA, 2004
- Tenofovir Disoproxil FumarateClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003