Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Cancer
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 363 (10), 943-953
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0908806
Abstract
Primary debulking surgery before initiation of chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We randomly assigned patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian-tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma to primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery (so-called interval debulking surgery). Of the 670 patients randomly assigned to a study treatment, 632 (94.3%) were eligible and started the treatment. The majority of these patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at primary debulking surgery (metastatic lesions that were larger than 5 cm in diameter in 74.5% of patients and larger than 10 cm in 61.6%). The largest residual tumor was 1 cm or less in diameter in 41.6% of patients after primary debulking and in 80.6% of patients after interval debulking. Postoperative rates of adverse effects and mortality tended to be higher after primary debulking than after interval debulking. The hazard ratio for death (intention-to-treat analysis) in the group assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking, as compared with the group assigned to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy, was 0.98 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.13; P=0.01 for noninferiority), and the hazard ratio for progressive disease was 1.01 (90% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Complete resection of all macroscopic disease (at primary or interval surgery) was the strongest independent variable in predicting overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease, whether performed as primary treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, remains the objective whenever cytoreductive surgery is performed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003636.)Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Timing of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancerInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2008
- Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysisGynecologic Oncology, 2006
- 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004)Annals of Oncology, 2005
- Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors [Ovarian Cancer]JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 285 PatientsGynecologic Oncology, 1998
- The Effect of Debulking Surgery after Induction Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Use of Serum Tumor Markers in the Differential Diagnosis between Ovarian and Colorectal AdenocarcinomasTumor Biology, 1992
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Intensive Surgical and Chemotherapeutic Management of Advanced Ovarian CancerSurgical Clinics of North America, 1978