A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 June 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (23), 1773-1780
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa012843
Abstract
The need for repeated treatment of restenosis of a treated vessel remains the main limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Because sirolimus (rapamycin) inhibits the proliferation of lymphocytes and smooth-muscle cells, we compared a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard uncoated stent in patients with angina pectoris. We performed a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the two types of stents for revascularization of single, primary lesions in native coronary arteries. The trial included 238 patients at 19 medical centers. The primary end point was in-stent late luminal loss (the difference between the minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure and the diameter at six months). Secondary end points included the percentage of in-stent stenosis of the luminal diameter and the rate of restenosis (luminal narrowing of 50 percent or more). We also analyzed a composite clinical end point consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization at 1, 6, and 12 months. At six months, the degree of neointimal proliferation, manifested as the mean (±SD) late luminal loss, was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group (–0.01±0.33 mm) than in the standard-stent group (0.80±0.53 mm, P<0.001). None of the patients in the sirolimus-stent group, as compared with 26.6 percent of those in the standard-stent group, had restenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter (P<0.001). There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. During a follow-up period of up to one year, the overall rate of major cardiac events was 5.8 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8 percent in the standard-stent group (P<0.001). The difference was due entirely to a higher rate of revascularization of the target vessel in the standard-stent group. As compared with a standard coronary stent, a sirolimus-eluting stent shows considerable promise for the prevention of neointimal proliferation, restenosis, and associated clinical events.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Rapamycin in transplantation: A review of the evidenceKidney International, 2001
- Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary StentingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Comparison of Coronary-Artery Stenting with Angioplasty for Isolated Stenosis of the Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent RestenosisCirculation, 1996
- Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: A volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Intravascular Stents to Prevent Occlusion and Re-Stenosis after Transluminal AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): A report from the PTCA registry of the national heart, lung, and blood instituteThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984