Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent—immediate and follow-up results
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 35 (5), 1145-1151
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00534-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stentingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Follow-up patency of side branches covered by intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stentAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- “Kissing” stents for bifurcational coronary lesionCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1993
- Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stentingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Frequency of success and complications of coronary angioplasty of a stenosis at the ostium of a branch vesselThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty: Incidence, angiographic characteristics, and outcomeCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1989
- Angioplasty at coronary bifurcations: Single-guide, two-wire techniqueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1986
- Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984