Comparison of Fractured Horizontal-Well Performance in Conventional and Unconventional Reservoirs

Abstract

This paper presents a discussion of fractured horizontal-well performance in conventional (milli-Darcy permeability) and unconventional (micro- to nano-Darcy permeability) reservoirs. It provides interpretations of the objective of fracturing horizontal wells in both types of formations. By using a trilinear-flow model, it is shown that the drainage volume of multiply-fractured-horizontal-wells is limited to the inner reservoir between the fractures even for relatively large matrix permeabilities. Unlike conventional reservoirs, favorable productivities are not warranted in unconventional-tight reservoirs because of high reservoir permeability and high hydraulic fracture conductivity. The most efficient mechanism to improve the productivity of unconventional-tight formations is to increase the density of natural fractures. High natural fracture permeabilities may not necessarily contribute to productivity. Decreasing fracture spacing increases the productivity of the well, but the incremental production for each additional fracture decreases. The trilinear-flow model presented in this work can be used to determine optimum hydraulic fracture properties for a multiply-fractured-horizontal-well. The model can also be used as a predictive tool. The information given in this paper should help the design of multiply-fractured-horizontal-wells and predict their performances.