Immunomodulation of murine visceral leishmaniasis by administration of monoclonal anti‐Ia antibodies: differential effects of anti‐I‐A vs. anti‐I‐E antibodies
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 17 (11), 1669-1672
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830171125
Abstract
On a B10 genetic background noncure and cure phenotypes for murine visceral leishmaniasis are controlled by H‐2. In this report results are presented which show the effects of administering specific anti‐I‐A and anti‐I‐E monoclonal antibodies to B10.D2/n (H‐2d) noncure mice prior to and during 85 days of infection with Leishmania donovani LV9. The effects of the two anti‐Ia antibodies were precisely equivalent in diminishing circulating anti‐leishmanial IgG levels throughout infection, possibly as a direct effect of the anti‐Ia antibodies in reducing the splenic B cell population. In terms of resolution of liver and spleen parasite loads, which is known to be dependent upon induction of a cell‐mediated immune response, dramatically different results were obtained with the two anti‐Ia antibodies. Anti‐I‐A treatment resulted in prolonged exacerbation of disease in liver and spleen. Anti‐I‐E treatment was associated with enhanced clearance of liver and spleen parasite loads beyond 30 days of infection. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that blocking major histocompatibility complex‐restricted antigen presentation by one class II molecule allows T cell responses controlled by the other to predominate. Hence, in H‐2d mice, I‐E controls suppressor activity while I‐A is associated with helper activity for cell‐mediated control of infection. The results offer some prospect for the development of haplotype‐ and class II molecule‐specific immunotherapeutic regimens in the host which might prevent the undesirable expansion of T cell populations which exacerbate disease without compromizing development of a curative cell‐mediated immune response.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- I-E expression and susceptibility to parasite infectionImmunology Today, 1987
- Effect of anti-Ia treatment on the production of anti-DNA antibody by NZB miceEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1986
- Use of immunological manipulations in studying genetically controlled responses to Leishmania donovani infection in miceParasitology, 1984
- Treatment of (NZB x NZW)F1 disease with anti-I-A monoclonal antibodies.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1983
- Immunoregulation of genetically controlled acquired responses to Leishmania donovani infection in mice: the effects of parasite dose, cyclophosphamide and sublethal irradiationParasite Immunology, 1983
- In vivo effects of antibodies to immune response gene products. I. Haplotype-specific suppression of humoral immune responses with a monoclonal anti-I-A.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1981
- Effects of blocking helper T cell induction in vivo with anti-Ia antibodies. Possible role of I-A/E hybrid molecules as restriction elements.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1980
- Immunological regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. III. Nature and significance of specific suppression of cell-mediated immunity in mice highly susceptible to Leishmania tropica.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1980
- Mechanisms of regulation of cell-mediated immunity: Anti-I-A alloantisera interfere with induction and expression of T-cell-mediated immunity to cell-bound antigen in vivoClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1980
- Influence of H–2 complex on acquired resistance to Leishmania donovani infection in miceNature, 1980