Conservation surgery for cancer of the larynx in the elderly‐
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 95 (2), 203-205
- https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198502000-00016
Abstract
The postoperative course was evaluated for 458 consecutive patients, all over the age of 56 years, who had undergone laryngeal conservation surgery in the last 10 years. One hundred seventy-one patients aged 66 and over made up the “elderly” group and 287 patients, aged between 56 and 65 years formed the control group. It was confirmed that cordectomy and frontolateral laryngectomy are feasible even in elderly patients. Bronchopneumonia is the most frequent and serious complication after supraglottic laryngectomy. Therefore this operation should be performed in the elderly patient only after a thorough evaluation of cardiac and respiratory function. Prophylactic neck dissection should not be done for No necks and the second therapeutic neck dissection in N2 cancers should be staged 6 or more weeks later. Hemilaryngopharyngectomy and subtotal reconstructive laryngectomy with cricohyoidpexis are not advisable in elderly patients.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laryngeal resection in patients of seventy years and overThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1980
- Conservation laryngeal surgery in the elderly patientThe Laryngoscope, 1977
- Composite resection in the elderly: A well‐tolerated procedureThe Laryngoscope, 1977
- The risks of major head and neck surgery in the aged populationThe Laryngoscope, 1977
- Conservation surgery for epidermoid carcinoma of the supraglottic larynxThe Laryngoscope, 1975
- La Laryngectomie Horizontale Sus-GlottiqueTumori Journal, 1974
- Mortality in surgery for head and neck cancerThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1973
- Conservation surgery for carcinoma of the supraglottisThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1970
- Head and Neck Surgery in Patients Past 70JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1966
- Head and neck surgery in patients of the older age group.The significance of chronological age in the evaluation of operative riskCancer, 1955