Marginal Structural Models as a Tool for Standardization
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 14 (6), 680-686
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000081989.82616.7d
Abstract
In this article, we show the general relation between standardization methods and marginal structural models. Standardization has been recognized as a method to control confounding and to estimate causal parameters of interest. Because standardization requires stratification by confounders, the sparse-data problem will occur when stratified by many confounders and one then might have an unstable estimator. A new class of causal models called marginal structural models has recently been proposed. In marginal structural models, the parameters are consistently estimated by the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method. Marginal structural models give a nonparametric standardization using the total group (exposed and unexposed) as the standard. In epidemiologic analysis, it is also important to know the change in the average risk of the exposed (or the unexposed) subgroup produced by exposure, which corresponds to the exposed (or the unexposed) group as the standard. We propose modifications of the weights in the marginal structural models, which give the nonparametric estimation of standardized parameters. With the proposed weights, we can use the marginal structural models as a useful tool for the nonparametric multivariate standardization.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 2000
- Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Causal Effect of Zidovudine on the Survival of HIV-Positive MenEpidemiology, 2000
- Invited Commentary: Propensity ScoresAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Causal diagrams for empirical researchBiometrika, 1995
- Estimating standardized parameters from generalized linear modelsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Large sample confidence intervals for regression standardized risks, risk ratios, and risk differencesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The Method of Expected Number of Deaths, 1786-1886-1986, Correspondent PaperInternational Statistical Review, 1987
- Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological ConfoundingInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 1982