Use of in Vivo/In Vitro Unscheduled Dna Synthesis for Identification of Organ-Specific Carcinogens
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology
- Vol. 17 (3), 245-277
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10408448709071210
Abstract
There are still only a few in vivo short-term assay methods for predicting potential organ-specific carcinogens and mutagens in mammals, although such methods are required for evaluating the in vivo effects of in vitro mutagens. In the in vivo/in vitro UDS assay methods described here, chemicals are given to experimental animals and induction of UDS in target organs is determined by in vitro organ culture or primary cell culture in the presence of [3H]dThd. Incorporation of [3H]dThd into DNA is measured with a liquid scintillation counter or by autoradiography. These methods have now been applied to the glandular stomach, forestomach, colon, liver, kidney, pancreas, tracheal epithelium, nasal epithelium, and spermatocytes. With minor modifications, they may also be applied to other organs. The present review shows that induction of UDS in various organs correlated well with the induction of cancer in these organs. The present authors have used the present methods to identify some potential organ-specific mutagens and carcinogens in mammals. The present authors found that three dicarbonyl compounds, glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and diacetyl, induced apparent UDS and TDS in the glandular stomach, and other groups found that 2-NT, MA6BT, and CNEt6BT induced UDS in the liver. These in vivo/in vitro UDS assays are better than in vitro UDS assay for identification of potential organ-specific mutagens and carcinogens in mammals and are especially useful for identifying potential mutagens and carcinogens that are specific for certain organs, such as the stomach, liver, and kidney. They are also useful for examining the potential mutagenicities and carcinogenicities of carcinogen analogs. However, these methods are not suitable for general in vivo screening because they are not yet available for all organs. A further advantage of the methods is that they can be used to examine larger numbers of animals at one time than other methods for detecting DNA damage, such as alkaline elution or alkaline sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Glyoxal enhanced cancer induction in the glandular stomach by the administration of a limited amount of MNNG and then glyoxal afterward in the two-stage stomach carcinogenesis.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct mutagenesis of Ha-ras-1 oncogenes by N-nitroso-N-methylurea during initiation of mammary carcinogenesis in ratsNature, 1985
- Measurement of unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat kidney cells following in vivo treatment with genotoxic agentsEnvironmental Mutagenesis, 1985
- Assessment of chemically-induced DNA repair in rat tracheal epithelial cellsCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1984
- THE METHODOLOGY OF SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGESPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- HUMAN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS IN MUTAGEN TESTSPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- Induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary cultures of rat pancreatic cells following in vivo and in vitro treatment with genotoxic agentsEnvironmental Mutagenesis, 1984
- An assay to detect chemically induced DNA repair in rat spermatocytesEnvironmental Mutagenesis, 1984
- Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity testMutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects, 1983
- Detection of unscheduled DNA synthesis in hepatocytes isolated from rats treated with genotoxic agents: an in vivo — in vitro assay for potential carcinogens and mutagensCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1980
- Use of DNA Repair Synthesis in Detecting Organotropic Actions of Chemical CarcinogensExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1974