Is it time for a reconsideration of the criteria for cone biopsy?
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 96 (11), 1345-1347
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03235.x
Abstract
Between August 1985 and November 1988, 475 laser cone biopsies were performed at the Regional Gynaecological Oncology Unit in Gateshead (England, UK). Of these, 332 were performed for abnormal cervical cytology and unsatisfactory colposcopy. The negative cone rate in this group was 34%. In those with cytological abnormalities up to and including mild dyskaryosis the figure was 64% and there were no cases of invasive disease. In this group the authors have reconsidered the criteria for cone biopsy and suggested biopsy of the visible ectocervical lesion combined with endocervical curettage or brushing. Those with negative histology or cytological abnormalities less than moderate dyskaryosis should be managed conservatively.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective study of colposcopy in women with mild dyskaryosis or koilocytosisBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Negative cone biopsies after colposcopy and their predictionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- A COMPARISON OF COMPLICATIONS OF LASER AND COLD KNIFE CONIZATION1983
- CONTACT HYSTEROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF THE ENDOCERVIX AS AN ADJUNCT TO COLPOSCOPY1982