Incorporating historical control data in planning phase II clinical trials
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3), 215-228
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090304
Abstract
Phase II studies of new medical treatments often use historical data on the standard treatment for comparative evaluation. Incorrectly disregarding inherent variability in the historical data may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the efficacy of the experimental treatment. We propose an approach to phase II trial design which accounts for both inter-study and intra-study variation. Our results indicate that it is sometimes best to randomize a proportion of the patients to a control arm. We choose this proportion to maximize the precision of the estimated experimental treatment effect. We evaluate operating characteristics of the design numerically, and provide illustrations based on historical data from cancer chemotherapy trials.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carboplatin: current status and future prospectsCancer Treatment Reviews, 1988
- Optimal allocation for Bayesian inference about an odds ratioBiometrika, 1987
- Binary Regression Using an Extended Beta-Binomial Distribution, with Discussion of Correlation Induced by Covariate Measurement ErrorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Sample size considerations for non-randomized comparative studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1980
- On the possibility of incorporating patients from non-randomising centres into a randomised clinical trialJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- Beta-Binomial Anova for ProportionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1978
- How many controls?Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1976
- The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1976
- Proportions with Extraneous Variance: Single and Independent SampleJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1973