Comparison of microarray‐based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens
- 22 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 28 (9), 789-795
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2053
Abstract
To compare the detection rate by microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in a prenatal population to that of a neonatal population referred for diagnostic testing. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis was performed for 151 prenatal cases and compared with the results from 1375 postnatal cases less than 3 months of age. Two of 151 prenatal cases (1.3%) showed a clinically significant cytogenetic abnormality. In contrast, of the 1375 postnatal cases studied, 11.4% showed a cytogenetic abnormality by aCGH. Many of these (40%) were referred for aCGH because of dysmorphic features, a clinical indication unlikely to be identified in the prenatal population. The chance of detecting a chromosome abnormality in a prenatal population that has already been screened by routine cytogenetics is ∼1.3%. However, given that many of the abnormal array results in the neonatal population were among those with dysmorphic features as the primary indication for testing, which are not easily identifiable by ultrasound, offering prenatal testing by aCGH to a wider population would likely result in a higher detection rate. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for subtelomeric chromosome alteration in a consecutive series of newborns with congenital defectsClinical Dysmorphology, 2008
- The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: Cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the futureAmerican Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-Seminars In Medical Genetics, 2007
- Microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalitiesGenetics in Medicine, 2007
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: Screening for Fetal Chromosomal AbnormalitiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Detection of Chromosome Aberrations in the Second Trimester Using Genetic Amniocentesis: Experience During 1995-2004Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Use of targeted array‐based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: Is less more?American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2005
- Changes in the Utilization of Prenatal DiagnosisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Epidemiology of Choanal Atresia With Special Reference to the CHARGE AssociationPediatrics, 1997
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the second trimester of pregnancy: Their characterization and delineation of defects in pregnancies at riskPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991
- Congenital anomalies in the newborninfant, including minor variationsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1964