Bad “Bad Baby” Bills
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 20 (1-2), 129-145
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800006468
Abstract
In the twenty-year-long debate over medical malpractice reform, obstetrics is unique. No other area of specialty medical practice has managed to argue successfully that its malpractice victims should be singled out and barred from obtaining relief through the tort system. Yet, following a well-organized lobbying effort by OB/GYNs, the state legislatures in Virginia and Florida have enacted so-called “bad baby bills” that create workers-compensation-type programs for victims of birth-related injuries. Such statutes provide the exclusive remedy for this and only this class of plaintiffs. Other states are considering following suit: bills have been introduced in North Carolina, Illinois and New York. What justifies this extraordinary legislative action? Proponents of the reforms admit that the effect of these statutes is to reduce the malpractice burden on OB/GYNs. But they are careful to portray patients rather than physicians as the primary beneficiaries of their efforts.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obstetrics and malpractice. Evidence on the performance of a selective no-fault systemPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Assuring the Quality of Medical Care: The Impact of Outcome Measurement and Practice StandardsLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1990
- No-Fault Cerebral Palsy Insurance: An Alternative to the Obstetrical Malpractice LotteryJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1989