Implementing and Validating a Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Patient Safety
- Vol. 1 (1), 33-40
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01209203-200503000-00008
Abstract
Background: The IOM identified patient safety as a significant problem. This paper describes the implementation and validation of a comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) in intensive care settings. Methods: An 8-step safety program was implemented in the Weinberg ICU, with a second control (SICU) subsequently receiving the intervention. Unit improvement teams (physician, nurse, administrator) were identified to champion efforts between staff and Safety Committee. CUSP steps: (1) culture of safety assessment; (2) sciences of safety education; (3) staff identification of safety concerns; (4) senior executives adopt a unit; (5) improvements implemented from safety concerns; (6) efforts documented/analyzed; (7) results shared; and (8) culture reassessment. Results: Safety culture improved post versus pre-intervention (35% to 52% in WICU and 35% to 67% in SICU). Senior executive adoption led to patient transport teams and pharmacy presence in ICUs. Interventions from safety assessment included: medication reconciliation, short-term goals sheet and relabeling epidural catheters. One-year post-CUSP implementation, length of stay (LOS) decreased from 2 to 1 day in WICU and 3 to 2 days in SICU (P < 0.05 WICU and SICU). Medication errors in transfer orders were nearly eliminated, and nursing turnover decreased from 9% to 2% in WICU and 8% to 2% in SICU (neither statistically significant). Conclusions: CUSP successfully implemented in 2 ICUs. CUSP can improve patient safety and reduce medication errors, LOS, and potentially nursing turnover.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveysBMJ, 2000
- Human error: models and managementBMJ, 2000
- Does CRM Training Improve Teamwork Skills in the Cockpit?: Two Evaluation StudiesHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1999
- An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical careThe Lancet, 1997
- A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Outcomes of Crew Resource Management TrainingThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1991
- Organizational culture.American Psychologist, 1990
- The structure of cockpit management attitudes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Cockpit Management AttitudesHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1984