A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Information Science
- Vol. 13 (5), 261-276
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158701300501
Abstract
Recent reductions in research budgets have led to the need for greater selectivity in resource allocation. Measures of past performance are still among the most promising means of deciding between competing interests. Bibliometry, the mea surement of scientific publications and of their impact on the scientific community, assessed by the citations they attract, provides a portfolio of indicators that can be combined to give a useful picture of recent research activity. In this state-of-the- art review the various methodologies that have been developed are outlined in terms of their strengths, weaknesses and par ticular applications. The present limitations of science indica tors in research evaluation are considered and some future directions for developments in techniques are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research gradings stir emotionsNature, 1986
- Bibliometric Techniques for Monitoring Performance in Technologically Oriented Research: The Case of Integrated OpticsR&D Management, 1986
- Agricultural R & DNature, 1985
- The assessment of scholarshipNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
- Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journalsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1980
- Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy AnalysisSocial Studies of Science, 1979
- Citation Analysis: Queries and CaveatsSocial Studies of Science, 1977
- The State of a Science: Indicators in the Specialty of Weak InteractionsSocial Studies of Science, 1977
- Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexingAmerican Documentation, 1965
- Criteria for scientific choiceMinerva, 1963