Autocontouring Versus Manual Contouring
Open Access
- 18 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Vol. 52 (4), 658.1-658
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.084897
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Autocontouring and Manual Contouring: Which Is the Better Method for Target Delineation Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer?Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010
- Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume MeasurementsJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010
- PET CT Thresholds for Radiotherapy Target Definition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: How Close Are We to the Pathologic Findings?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010
- Accurate Automatic Delineation of Heterogeneous Functional Volumes in Positron Emission Tomography for Oncology ApplicationsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010
- Comparison of Tumor Volumes as Determined by Pathologic Examination and FDG-PET/CT Images of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot StudyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2009
- Automated Radiation Targeting in Head-and-Neck Cancer Using Region-Based Texture Analysis of PET and CT ImagesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2009
- A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PETIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2009
- A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validationEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007
- Fully automated segmentation of oncological PET volumes using a combined multiscale and statistical modelMedical Physics, 2007
- Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithmsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2003