Therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia following treatment with epipodophyllotoxins: Estimating the risks
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Medical and Pediatric Oncology
- Vol. 23 (2), 86-98
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mpo.2950230205
Abstract
In the past decade, therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) following treatment with regimens that include inhibitors of topoisomerase‐II (TOPO‐II) has been reported with increasing frequency. These cases of t‐AML generally have a shorter latency period than t‐AML following alkylator therapy, are associated with chromosomal translocations (especially involving chromosome band 11q23), and usually present as M4 or M5 FAB subtype. Although the epipodophyllotoxins (etoposide and teniposide) have been most often implicated, similar cases of t‐AML occur following therapy with other classes of Topo‐II inhibitors (e.g., anthracyclines). There is wide variation in published studies in the estimates of risk of t‐AML following epipodophyllotoxin therapy. These varying estimates may reflect a number of factors, including: small sample size leading to large confidence intervals around risk estimates; varying susceptibility of different patient populations; varying schedules of epipodophyllotoxin administration; different cumulative doses of epipodophyllotoxins; and administration of epopodophyllotoxins with additional agents that may alter the leukemogenic effect of the epipodophyllotoxins. Available data suggest that children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) treated with high cumulative doses of epipodophyllotoxins using either weekly or twice‐weekly schedules of administration have a relatively high risk of developing t‐AML (5–12% cumulative risk). On the other hand, germ cell patients treated with relatively low cumulative doses of etoposide (usually 1,500–2,500 mg/m2) appear to have a low risk for developing t‐AML. There is inadequate experience at this time with higher cumulative doses of etoposide (e.g., 4,000–5,000 mg/m2 as used for pediatric solid tumors) given on a daily x 5 schedule to allow estimates of risk to be developed for this schedule and cumulative dose. The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has developed a monitoring plan designed to obtain reliable estimates of the risk of t‐AML following epipodophyllotoxin treatment. Twelve Cooperative Group clinical trials that use epipodophyllotoxins at either low (4,000 mg/m2) are being prospectively monitored for cases of t‐AML occurring among patients entered onto the trials. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.1Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distribution of topoisomerase II cleavage sites in simian virus 40 DNA and the effects of drugsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1991
- Chromosome aberrations induced by etoposide (VP‐16) are not randomInternational Journal of Cancer, 1990
- The topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26 induces marked changes in histone H1 kinase activity, histones H1 and H3 phosphorylation, and chromosome condensation in G2 phase and mitotic BHK cells.The Journal of cell biology, 1990
- Leukemia Following Hodgkin's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Leukemia Following Chemotherapy for Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Function of DNA topoisomerases as replication swivels in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- Treatment of Disseminated Germ-Cell Tumors with Cisplatin, Bleomycin, and either Vinblastine or EtoposideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Leukemia after Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Semustine (Methyl-CCNU) — Evidence of a Dose–Response EffectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Leukemia and Preleukemia after Adjuvant Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer with Semustine (Methyl-CCNU)New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia after Therapy with Alkylating Agents for Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982