Abstract
Urethral pressure profiles were done on 46 children by the classical open-end perfused catheter and by a micro-transducer mounted on a catheter tip. A comparative study of the results obtained using the 2 methods demonstrates clearly the superiority of the micro-transducer over the perfused catheter. There were so many limitations of precision with the perfused catheter method that its usefulness for clinical studies seems questionable. With both methods the urethral pressure profile alone was not sufficient for distinguishing between obstructed and non-obstructed bladder outlets.