Test-Cost Sensitive Naive Bayes Classification
- 31 March 2005
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Abstract
Inductive learning techniques such as the naive Bayes and decision tree algorithms have been extended in the past to handle different types of costs mainly by distinguishing different costs of classification errors. However, it is an equally important issue to consider how to handle the test costs associated with querying the missing values in a test case. When the value of an attribute is missing in a test case, it may or may not be worthwhile to take the effort to obtain its missing value, depending on how much the value results in a potential gain in the classification accuracy. In this paper, we show how to obtain a test-cost sensitive naive Bayes classifier (csNB) by including a test strategy which determines how unknown attributes are selected to perform test on in order to minimize the sum of the mis-classification costs and test costs. We propose and evaluate several potential test strategies including one that allows several tests to be done at once. We empirically evaluate the csNB method, and show that it compares favorably with its decision tree counterpart.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision trees with minimal costsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2004
- Learning cost-sensitive active classifiers☆☆This extends the short conference paper [19].Artificial Intelligence, 2002
- MetaCostPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1999
- On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One LossMachine Learning, 1997
- Cost-Sensitive Classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction AlgorithmJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1995
- Cost-sensitive learning of classification knowledge and its applications in roboticsMachine Learning, 1993
- The use of background knowledge in decision tree inductionMachine Learning, 1991
- The Complexity of Markov Decision ProcessesMathematics of Operations Research, 1987