The Promised End — Constitutional Aspects of Physician-Assisted Suicide
- 29 August 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 335 (9), 683-688
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199608293350924
Abstract
The debate over physician-assisted suicide has dramatically shifted to a discussion of constitutional issues. This spring, within a month of each other, U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals on both coasts ruled that state prohibitions of assisted suicide are unconstitutional when applied to physicians who prescribe lethal medication for terminally ill, competent adults who wish to end their lives.1,2 The Ninth Circuit includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, and the Second Circuit includes New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. Both courts reached the same conclusion but for different legal reasons.In the Ninth Circuit, four physicians . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the publicThe Lancet, 1996
- Pain Relief, Acceleration of Death, and Criminal LawKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1996
- Observations Concerning Terminally Ill Patients Who Choose SuicideJournal of Pharmaceutical Care in Pain & Symptom Control, 1996
- A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal InvestigatorsJAMA, 1995
- Death by PrescriptionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Nancy Cruzan and the Right to DieNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment: The Role of the Criminal LawLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1987