Effectiveness of Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources for Answering Primary Care Physicians' Information Needs
Open Access
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 13 (6), 653-659
- https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2087
Abstract
Objective: To determine if clinician-selected electronic information resources improve primary care physicians' abilities to answer simulated clinical questions. Design: Observational study using hour-long interviews in physician offices and think-aloud protocols. Participants answered 23 multiple-choice questions and chose 2 to obtain further information using their own information resources. We established which resources physicians chose, processes used, and results obtained when looking for information to support their answers. Measurements: Correctness of answers before and after searching, resources used, and searching techniques. Results: 23 physicians sought answers to 46 questions using their own information resources. They spent a mean of 13.0 (SD 5.5) minutes searching for information for the two questions using an average of 1.8 resources per question and a wide variety of searching techniques. On average 43.5% of the answers to the original 23 questions were correct. For the questions that were searched, 18 (39.1%) of the 46 answers were correct before searching. After searching, the number of correct answers was 19 (42.1%). This difference of 1 correct answer was attributed to 6 questions (13.0%) going from an incorrect to correct answer and 5 (10.9%) questions going from a correct to incorrect answer. We found differences in the ability of various resources to provide correct answers. Conclusion: For the primary care physicians studied, electronic information resources of choice did not always provide support for finding correct answers to simulated clinical questions and in some instances, individual resources may have contributed to an initially correct answer becoming incorrect.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: A literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studiesInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2005
- Use of point‐of‐care online clinical evidence by junior and senior doctors in New South Wales public hospitalsInternal Medicine Journal, 2005
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- The Impact of an Online Evidence System on Confidence in Decision Making in a Controlled SettingMedical Decision Making, 2005
- Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2005
- General practitioners’ use of online evidence during consultationsInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2005
- Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related ErrorsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003
- Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of ElectrocardiogramsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003
- Factors Associated with Success in Searching MEDLINE and Applying Evidence to Answer Clinical QuestionsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002
- Effect of online literature searching on length of stay and patient care costsAcademic Medicine, 1994