Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Genetics
- Vol. 39 (1), 309-338
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725
Abstract
Orthologs and paralogs are two fundamentally different types of homologous genes that evolved, respectively, by vertical descent from a single ancestral gene and by duplication. Orthology and paralogy are key concepts of evolutionary genomics. A clear distinction between orthologs and paralogs is critical for the construction of a robust evolutionary classification of genes and reliable functional annotation of newly sequenced genomes. Genome comparisons show that orthologous relationships with genes from taxonomically distant species can be established for the majority of the genes from each sequenced genome. This review examines in depth the definitions and subtypes of orthologs and paralogs, outlines the principal methodological approaches employed for identification of orthology and paralogy, and considers evolutionary and functional implications of these concepts.Keywords
This publication has 96 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tree pattern matching in phylogenetic trees: automatic search for orthologs or paralogs in homologous gene sequence databasesBioinformatics, 2005
- Gene dosage balance: deletions, duplications and dominanceTrends in Genetics, 2005
- The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicatesTrends in Genetics, 2004
- Preferential Duplication of Conserved Proteins in Eukaryotic GenomesPLoS Biology, 2004
- Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestorNature Reviews Microbiology, 2003
- An exosome‐like complex in Sulfolobus solfataricusEMBO Reports, 2003
- Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeastNature, 2003
- The modern molecular clockNature Reviews Genetics, 2003
- The structure of the protein universe and genome evolutionNature, 2002
- Replisome-Mediated DNA ReplicationAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 2001