Improving the Prediction of Reading for the Individual Child
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 19 (5), 262-269
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601900502
Abstract
In a follow-up of 208 boys, the 16 who scored low on a prekindergarten screening battery, but were satisfactory readers four years later, were compared with 13 others, who were low on both prekindergarten and reading measures. All but two of the 16 good readers, but only one poor reader, were classified by criteria consisting mainly of biographical variables. Four sets of biographical and screening data, applied to the 179 boys who scored above the screening cutoff, identified 16 of 17 who became poor readers, but only one good reader. The four subgroups identified resembled subtypes of reading disability found by some researchers.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reading Disability in an Epidemiological ContextJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1984
- The Prediction of Good and Poor Reading Before Kindergarten Entry: A 4-Year Follow-UpThe Journal of Special Education, 1982
- How Many Kinds of Reading Disabilit Are There?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
- Relationship Between Pregnancy and Birth Complications and the Later Development of Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
- Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilitiesNeuropsychologia, 1976
- Early Identification of Children with High Risk of Reading FailureJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1974
- Early Detection of Learning Problems: Questions, Cautions, and GuidelinesExceptional Children, 1973
- Cumulative Minor DeficitsJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1972
- Developmental and Psychological Differences between Readers and NonreadersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
- A Retrospective Study of 82 Children with Reading DisabilityDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1970