Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillation: Lethal delays of chest compressions before and after countershocks
- 31 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 42 (4), 458-467
- https://doi.org/10.1067/s0196-0644(03)00525-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival and neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different chest compression-ventilation ratiosAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2002
- Potential impact of public access defibrillators on survival after out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2002
- Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated DefibrillationCirculation, 2002
- Importance of Continuous Chest Compressions During Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCirculation, 2002
- Outcome of out-of-hospital postcountershock asystole and pulseless electrical activity versus primary asystole and pulseless electrical activityCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Interrupting Chest Compressions for Rescue Breathing During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac ArrestCirculation, 2001
- Amiodarone for Resuscitation after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Prior to Defibrillation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular FibrillationJAMA, 1999
- Rhythm changes during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in relation to delay until defibrillation, number of shocks delivered and survivalResuscitation, 1997
- High-Dose Epinephrine in Adult Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992