Communication of biobanks' research results: What do (potential) participants want?
- 26 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
- Vol. 152A (10), 2482-2492
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33617
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate (potential) research participants' (a) information preferences with regard to receiving biobanks' genetic research results, and (b) attitudes towards the duties of researchers to communicate research results. A total group of 1,678 was analyzed, consisting of a sample of the general Dutch population (N = 1,163) and patients with asthma, rhinitis, and thrombosis (N = 515) who completed a survey including six fictitious genetic research results each presented as aggregate and individual result, varied for treatability and kind of disease. Five questions assessed attitudes towards researchers' duties to communicate research results. Additionally, background characteristics were measured. A majority of the respondents wanted to receive aggregate results as well as individual results. A small majority (59%) held the view that researchers should communicate individual results with no health consequences. One third agreed with an information duty only when treatment is available. A preference for individual results and an attitude in favor of communicating results were both associated with belonging to the general Dutch population rather than being a patient, wanting to learn about own health as the reason for biobank-participation, a monitoring coping style, a general desire for health information, perceived meaningfulness of genetic information and no anticipated anxiousness. A sizable majority of respondents showed a high information preference for individual results, even when it is unclear that treatment is available. Fewer were of the opinion that researchers should make this possible. For their communication policy biobanks should take notice of (potential) participants' high information preferences and expectations.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2008
- The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participantsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2008
- The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabledBMC Health Services Research, 2008
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participantsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2008
- The Law of Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Establishing Researchers' DutiesJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- Usefulness of the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory in individuals considering genetic testing for cancer riskPatient Education and Counseling, 2007
- Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical ResearchJAMA, 2005
- Polymorphisms in SPINK5 are not associated with asthma in a Dutch populationJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2005
- Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative studyThe Lancet, 2005