Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 53 (3), 165-173
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(94)90115-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Differences in the Use of Obstetric InterventionsJAMA, 1990
- Alternative Strategies for Controlling Rising Cesarean Section RatesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Increased obstetric activity: a new meaning to "induced labour"?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1989
- A Successful Program to Lower Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Role of Evidence in the Consensus ProcessPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rateEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1987
- Prophylactic Cesarean Section at Term?New England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Rise of the Caesarean Section: A ReviewAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1984
- Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in EuropeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- CAESAREAN‐SECTION RATES IN AUSTRALIA: A POPULATION‐BASED AUDITThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1979