18-FDG-PET as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Comparison with CT

Abstract

Less than 50% of newly diagnosed patients with aggressive histology Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) are cured with standard treatment. The ability to accurately monitor response to treatment is crucial in order to select out patients who need more intensive or salvage treatment. This study assesses the accuracy of FDG-PET as compared to CT in remission assessment following treatment of aggressive NHL, and its value in estimating relapse-free survival. It also evaluates the prognostic value of early interim PET scan in prediction of treatment outcome. Forty-nine adult patients with biopsy-proven aggressive NHL between September 1993 and December 1997 were included. All patients had pre-treatment FDG-PET demonstrating increased uptake in sites of disease. Forty-five patients had a post-treatment PET to assess remission status and 4 had an interim but not a post-treatment PET. Thirty-three of these patients also had a pre- and a post-treatment CT scan. Twenty-three of the 49 patients had an interim PET during chemotherapy to assess early response. PET and CT scan results were correlated with relapse data to examine their accuracy in remission assessment and prediction of prognosis. The median follow-up duration is 30 months. Overall the result of post-treatment PET scan appears to predict disease outcome, with relapse rates of 100% (9/9) and 17% (6/36) for positive and negative PET respectively [p0.1). PET was particularly useful in assessment of residual masses seen on CT scan. The interim PET provided valuable information regarding early assessment of response and long-term prognosis, with no relapses in patients with no or minimal residual uptake compared to 87.5% relapse rate in patients with persistent PET activity (p<0.001). FDG-PET is an accurate method of assessing remission and estimating prognosis following treatment of aggressive NHL, with positive and negative predictive accuracies of 100% and 82% respectively. PET is more accurate than CT in assessing remission and prediction of relapse-free survival. An interim PET scan after 2-3 cycles of chemotherapy predicts the long-term outcome early-on and has a high negative predictive value (100%). This may assist to separate at an early stage good-prognosis patients who are likely to be cured with standard chemotherapy from those patients with poorer prognosis who require alternative treatment.