Procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis in critically ill adults and after surgery or trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (7), 1996-2003
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000226413.54364.36
Abstract
To quantify the accuracy of serum procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock in adults in intensive care units or after surgery or trauma, alone and compared with C-reactive protein. To draw and compare the summary receiver operating characteristics curves for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein from the literature. MEDLINE (keywords: procalcitonin, intensive care, sepsis, postoperative sepsis, trauma); screening of the literature. Meta-analysis of all 49 published studies in medical, surgical, or polyvalent intensive care units or postoperative wards. Children, medical patients, and immunocompromised patients were excluded. Thirty-three studies fulfilled inclusion criteria (3,943 patients, 1,828 males, 922 females; mean age: 56.1 yrs; 1,825 patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock; 1,545 with only systemic inflammatory response syndrome); eight studies could not be analyzed statistically. Global mortality rate was 29.3%. Global odds ratios for diagnosis of infection complicated by systemic inflammation were 15.7 for the 25 studies (2,966 patients) using procalcitonin (95% confidence interval, 9.1–27.1) and 5.4 for the 15 studies (1,322 patients) using C-reactive protein (95% confidence interval, 3.2–9.2). The summary receiver operating characteristics curve for procalcitonin was better than for C-reactive protein. In the 15 studies using both markers, the Q* value (intersection of summary receiver operating characteristics curve with the diagonal line where sensitivity equals specificity) was significantly higher for procalcitonin than for C-reactive protein (0.78 vs. 0.71, p = .02), the former test showing better accuracy. Procalcitonin represents a good biological diagnostic marker for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock, difficult diagnoses in critically ill patients. Procalcitonin is superior to C-reactive protein. Procalcitonin should be included in diagnostic guidelines for sepsis and in clinical practice in intensive care units.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Procalcitonin is a Valuable Prognostic Marker in Cardiac Surgery but not Specific for InfectionThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 2003
- Post‐operative hypoalbuminaemia and procalcitonin elevation for prediction of outcome in cardiopulmonary bypass surgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2003
- The Clinical Value of Procalcitonin and Neopterin in Predicting Sepsis and Organ Failure After Major TraumaShock, 2003
- Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of sepsisCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection in cardiac surgical patientsCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Discrimination of sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome by determination of circulating plasma concentrations of procalcitonin, protein complement 3a, and interleukin-6Critical Care Medicine, 2000
- Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Sensitivity and specificity of various markers of inflammation for the prediction of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 in patients with sepsisCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Outcome Prediction by Traditional and New Markers of Inflammation in Patients with Sepsiscclm, 1999
- Evolution and significance of circulating procalcitonin levels compared with IL-6, TNFα and endotoxin levels early after thermal injuryBurns, 1997