Sample selection versus two-part models revisited: The case of female smoking and drinking
- 29 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Health Economics
- Vol. 27 (2), 300-307
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ageing and health‐care expenditure: the red herring argument revisitedHealth Economics, 2004
- Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner SolutionsHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2003
- The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its CritiqueJournal of Economic Surveys, 2000
- Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring?Health Economics, 1999
- On the choice between sample selection and two-part modelsJournal of Econometrics, 1996
- Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable is WeakJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- A double‐hurdle model of cigarette consumptionJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1989
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable GoodsEconometrica, 1971
- A Test of the Mean Square Error Criterion for Restrictions in Linear RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1968