Probability discounting among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers: molecular analysis discerns group differences
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Behavioural Pharmacology
- Vol. 18 (7), 633-639
- https://doi.org/10.1097/fbp.0b013e3282effbd3
Abstract
Despite numerous studies documenting differences in temporal discounting among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers, studies of probability discounting have had mixed results. This study sought to clarify these results with a molecular analysis of data obtained from a study of probability discounting. Thirty heavy cigarette smokers and 29 nonsmokers were compared using a probability discounting procedure. When these data were fit to a hyperbolic model of discounting, nonstatistically significant group difference between smokers and nonsmokers were observed in the predicted direction. A molecular analysis of indifference points indicated that statistically significant differences between groups were obscured by a possible floor effect. Specifically, indifference points obtained from high probabilities were lower for heavy cigarette smokers relative to nonsmokers, whereas no difference was observed with indifference points obtained from low probabilities. This molecular analysis suggests that the prior inconsistent results are due to floor effects resulting from greater inclusion of low probabilities. Rate of smoking may also be an important factor, with differences more likely observed when heavy smokers are enrolled.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and lossesMemory & Cognition, 2006
- Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2003
- Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processesAddiction, 2001
- Perceived Risks of Heart Disease and Cancer Among Cigarette SmokersJAMA, 1999
- Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1999
- Exponential Versus Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Outcomes: Risk and Waiting TimeAmerican Zoologist, 1996
- Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income.Psychology and Aging, 1996
- Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span ComparisonPsychological Science, 1994
- Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance QuestionnaireJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1989
- Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin, 1975